Lightweight Mamba Networks for Edge-Based Medical Image Classification and Diagnosis

Authors

  • Mateo M. Ortiz Department of Computer Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.

Keywords:

edge computing; medical image classification; state space models; Mamba networks; federated learning; clinical governance; diagnostic infrastructure; lightweight architectures

Abstract

Medical image classification has advanced rapidly through large-scale deep learning, yet translating these models into point-of-care diagnostics remains difficult because of privacy, latency, connectivity, and computational constraints. Edge-based deployment offers a possible solution by moving inference and selective learning closer to the clinical site, but conventional convolutional and attention-based architectures often carry assumptions that are poorly aligned with constrained hardware, heterogeneous imaging environments, and regulated healthcare workflows. Selective state space models, particularly lightweight Mamba networks, provide a promising alternative because they combine linear-time sequence processing with input-dependent state transitions that can capture long-range dependencies without the quadratic cost of self-attention. This paper examines the system-level implications of adopting lightweight Mamba networks for edge-based medical image classification and diagnosis. It addresses architectural trade-offs in tokenization, state dimensioning, scan direction, and hybrid feature extraction. It further analyzes the integration of such networks into federated learning, differential privacy, robustness engineering, and clinical governance. Rather than focusing narrowly on accuracy, the discussion emphasizes structural trade-offs across energy budgets, hardware heterogeneity, adversarial exposure, fairness, auditability, and lifecycle management. The paper argues that lightweight Mamba architectures should be understood as socio-technical components embedded within distributed diagnostic infrastructures. Their clinical value depends not only on algorithmic performance but also on how effectively they are governed, monitored, and aligned with delivery systems, regulatory expectations, and sustainability goals.

References

1. Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017). A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Medical Image Analysis, 42, 60–88.

2. Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017). Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature, 542(7639), 115–118.

3. Rajpurkar, P., Irvin, J., Zhu, K., Yang, B., Mehta, H., Duan, T., Ding, D., Bagul, A., Langlotz, C., Shpanskaya, K., Lungren, M. P., & Ng, A. Y. (2017). CheXNet: Radiologist-level pneumonia detection on chest X-rays with deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05225.

4. Irvin, J., Rajpurkar, P., Ko, M., Yu, Y., Ciurea-Ilcus, S., Chute, C., Marklund, H., Haghgoo, B., Ball, R. L., Shpanskaya, K., Seekins, J., Mong, D. A., Halabi, S. S., Sandberg, J. K., Jones, R., Larson, D. B., Langlotz, C. P., Patel, B. N., Lungren, M. P., & Ng, A. Y. (2019). CheXpert: A large chest radiograph dataset with uncertainty labels and expert comparison. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33, 590–597.

5. Gu, A., & Dao, T. (2023). Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00752.

6. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 770–778.

7. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., Uszkoreit, J., & Houlsby, N. (2021). An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. International Conference on Learning Representations.

8. Tan, M., & Le, Q. (2019). EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, 6105–6114.

9. Howard, A. G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., & Adam, H. (2017). MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861.

10. Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., & Chen, L. C. (2018). MobileNetV2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 4510–4520.

11. Zhou, Z., Chen, X., Li, E., Zeng, L., Luo, K., & Zhang, J. (2019). Edge intelligence: Paving the last mile of artificial intelligence with edge computing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(8), 1738–1762.

12. Chen, J., & Ran, X. (2019). Deep learning with edge computing: A review. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(8), 1655–1674.

13. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletari, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., Ourselin, S., Sheller, M., Summers, R. M., Trask, A., Xu, D., Baust, M., & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. npj Digital Medicine, 3, 119.

14. Zheng, X., Chen, X., Gong, S., Griffin, X., & Slabaugh, G. (2025, September). Xfmamba: Cross-fusion mamba for multi-view medical image classification. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (pp. 672-682). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

15. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Agüera y Arcas, B. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 1273–1282.

16. Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., & Smith, A. (2006). Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. Theory of Cryptography Conference, 265–284.

17. Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 308–318.

18. Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2015). Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. International Conference on Learning Representations.

19. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453.

20. Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501–507.

21. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56.

22. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Mateo M. Ortiz. (2026). Lightweight Mamba Networks for Edge-Based Medical Image Classification and Diagnosis. Bioinformatics Insights and Analytics, 1(2). Retrieved from https://www.bioinfia.org/index.php/home/article/view/227