Hierarchical Mamba Networks for Multi-Organ Segmentation in Abdominal Medical Imaging
Keywords:
hierarchical Mamba networks, multi-organ segmentation, abdominal medical imaging, state space models, clinical deployment, data governance, fairness, sustainabilityAbstract
Abdominal multi-organ segmentation remains a critical task in medical image analysis because quantitative organ delineation supports treatment planning, surgical guidance, and disease monitoring. Although deep learning has produced substantial advances, convolutional approaches tend to emphasize local spatial patterns, while transformer-based methods can capture long-range context at considerable computational cost. Hierarchical Mamba networks represent an emerging alternative that combines selective state space sequence modeling with multiscale representation learning. This paper provides a system-level analysis of hierarchical Mamba networks for multi-organ segmentation in abdominal imaging. Rather than focusing solely on architectural novelty, the discussion addresses structural trade-offs in representation capacity, memory use, scan ordering, and multiscale fusion. It further examines data infrastructure and governance requirements, including annotation quality, demographic bias, privacy protections, and federated learning arrangements. Deployment concerns such as prospective validation, input verification, uncertainty visualization, and integration with clinical workflows are explored. Fairness, regulatory accountability, and sustainability are treated as first-order design constraints rather than post hoc considerations. The paper argues that hierarchical Mamba architectures can support more efficient long-range modeling than attention-based alternatives, but their clinical value depends on robust governance, operational monitoring, and deliberate alignment with diverse patient populations. Future directions include adaptive scan strategies, uncertainty-aware abstention, longitudinal cross-fusion, and resource-aware deployment for lower-resource settings.
References
1. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015 (pp. 234–241). Springer.
2. Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2021). nnU-Net: A self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nature Methods, 18(2), 203–211.
3. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., Uszkoreit, J., & Houlsby, N. (2021). An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
4. Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., & Guo, B. (2021). Swin Transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 10012–10022).
5. Hatamizadeh, A., Tang, Y., Nath, V., Yang, D., Myronenko, A., Landman, B., Roth, H. R., & Xu, D. (2022). UNETR: Transformers for 3D medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (pp. 574–584).
6. Gu, A., & Dao, T. (2023). Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00752.
7. Wang, Z., Zheng, J.-Q., Zhang, Y., Cui, G., & Li, L. (2024). Mamba-UNet: UNet-like pure visual Mamba for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05079.
8. Xing, Z., Ye, T., Yang, Y., Liu, G., & Zhu, L. (2024). SegMamba: Long-range sequential modeling Mamba for 3D medical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2024 (pp. 578–588). Springer.
9. Zheng, X., Chen, X., Gong, S., Griffin, X., & Slabaugh, G. (2025, September). Xfmamba: Cross-fusion mamba for multi-view medical image classification. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (pp. 672-682). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
10. Zhu, L., Liao, B., Zhang, Q., Wang, X., Liu, W., & Wang, X. (2024). Vision Mamba: Efficient visual representation learning with bidirectional state space model. In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning.
11. Chen, J., Lu, Y., Yu, Q., Luo, X., Adeli, E., Wang, Y., Lu, L., Yuille, A. L., & Zhou, Y. (2021). TransUNet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04306.
12. Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017). A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis. Medical Image Analysis, 42, 60–88.
13. Willemink, M. J., Koszek, W. A., Hardell, C., Wu, J., Fleischmann, D., Harvey, H., Folio, L. R., Summers, R. M., Rubin, D. L., & Lungren, M. P. (2020). Preparing medical imaging data for machine learning. Radiology, 295(1), 4–15.
14. Sambasivan, N., Kapania, S., Highfill, H., Akrong, D., Paritosh, P., & Aroyo, L. M. (2021). "Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data cascades in high-stakes AI. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–15).
15. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.
16. Rajkomar, A., Hardt, M., Howell, M. D., Corrado, G., & Chin, M. H. (2018). Ensuring fairness in machine learning to advance health equity. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(12), 866–872.
17. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., Ourselin, S., Sheller, M., Summers, R. M., Trask, A., Xu, D., Baust, M., & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. npj Digital Medicine, 3, Article 119.
18. Wiens, J., Saria, S., Sendak, M., Ghassemi, M., Liu, V. X., Doshi-Velez, F., Jung, K., Heller, K., Kale, D., Saeed, M., Ossorio, P. N., Thadaney-Israni, S., & Goldenberg, A. (2019). Do no harm: A roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care. Nature Medicine, 25(9), 1337–1340.
19. Muehlematter, U. J., Daniore, P., & Vokinger, K. N. (2021). Approval of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based medical devices in the USA and Europe. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(3), e195–e203.
20. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56.
21. Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & McCallum, A. (2019). Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 3645–3650).
22. Thompson, N. C., Greenewald, K., Lee, K., & Manso, G. F. (2020). The computational limits of deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.05558.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bioinformatics Insights and Analytics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.