AI-Driven Indoor Air Quality Prediction and Health Risk Assessment of Volatile Organic Compounds

Authors

  • Danqing Duan Department of Computer Science, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.

Keywords:

indoor air quality; volatile organic compounds; artificial intelligence; health risk assessment; smart buildings; data governance

Abstract

Indoor air quality is a persistent public health challenge because volatile organic compounds emitted from building materials, furnishings, cleaning products, and occupant activities can produce chronic and acute health effects that are not well captured by episodic monitoring. The increasing availability of low-cost sensors, building management data, and machine learning methods has created new opportunities for continuous indoor air quality prediction. However, the translation of predicted volatile organic compound concentrations into meaningful health risk information requires more than model accuracy. It demands careful attention to system architecture, exposure science, data governance, uncertainty communication, robustness, fairness, and deployment context. This paper presents a system-level analysis of AI-driven indoor air quality prediction and health risk assessment for volatile organic compounds. It examines the structural design of sensing and modeling pipelines, the integration of toxicological and exposure considerations, the governance of occupant-related data, and the policy trade-offs that arise when predictive systems are deployed in heterogeneous buildings. The discussion emphasizes that AI-based prediction should be understood as part of a larger socio-technical infrastructure rather than as an isolated computational task. A well-designed system must balance predictive performance with interpretability, privacy protection, equity, and operational sustainability. The paper concludes by identifying directions for interdisciplinary research and policy development to ensure that AI-enhanced indoor air quality management improves health outcomes without exacerbating existing environmental disparities.

References

1. World Health Organization. (2010). WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: Selected pollutants. WHO Regional Office for Europe.

2. Samet, J. M., Marbury, M. C., & Spengler, J. D. (1987). Health effects and sources of indoor air pollution. Part I. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 136(6), 1486–1508.

3. Weschler, C. J. (2009). Changes in indoor pollutants since the 1950s. Atmospheric Environment, 43(1), 153–169.

4. Logue, J. M., McKone, T. E., Sherman, M. H., & Singer, B. C. (2011). Hazard assessment of chemical air contaminants measured in residences. Indoor Air, 21(2), 92–109.

5. Salthammer, T., Mentese, S., & Marutzky, R. (2010). Formaldehyde in the indoor environment. Chemical Reviews, 110(4), 2536–2572.

6. Sarigiannis, D. A., Karakitsios, S. P., Gotti, A., Liakos, I. L., & Katsoyiannis, A. (2011). Exposure to major volatile organic compounds and carbonyls in European indoor environments and associated health risk. Environment International, 37(4), 743–765.

7. Klepeis, N. E., Nelson, W. C., Ott, W. R., Robinson, J. P., Tsang, A. M., Switzer, P., Behar, J. V., Hern, S. C., & Engelmann, W. H. (2001). The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 11(3), 231–252.

8. Brown, S. K., Sim, M. R., Abramson, M. J., & Gray, C. N. (1994). Concentrations of volatile organic compounds in indoor air – A review. Indoor Air, 4(2), 123–134.

9. Weschler, C. J., & Shields, H. C. (1999). Indoor ozone/terpene reactions as a source of indoor particles. Atmospheric Environment, 33(15), 2301–2312.

10. Wei, W., Ramalho, O., Mandin, C., & Cattaneo, A. (2015). Indoor air quality modeling using machine learning: A review. Building and Environment, 94, 460–469.

11. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794). ACM.

12. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.

13. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (pp. 5998–6008). Curran Associates.

14. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.

15. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?" Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1135–1144). ACM.

16. Yan, D., O'Brien, W., Hong, T., Feng, X., Burak Gunay, H., Tahmasebi, F., & Mahdavi, A. (2015). Occupant behavior modeling for building performance simulation: Current state and future challenges. Energy and Buildings, 94, 264–278.

17. Fan, Yi, et al. "Residential VOC from building materials: Exposures, health risks, and ambient hazards." Sustainable Cities and Society 119 (2025): 106080.

18. Nazaroff, W. W. (2004). Indoor particle dynamics. Indoor Air, 14(Suppl 7), 175–183.

19. Bluyssen, P. M. (2014). The healthy indoor environment: How to assess occupants' wellbeing in buildings. Routledge.

20. Kumar, P., Skouloudis, A. N., Bell, M., Viana, M., Carotta, M. C., Biskos, G., & Morawska, L. (2016). Real-time sensors for indoor air monitoring and challenges ahead in deploying them to urban areas. Science of the Total Environment, 560-561, 150–159.

21. Sherman, M. H., & Walker, I. S. (2011). Meeting residential ventilation standards through dynamic control of ventilation systems. Energy and Buildings, 43(8), 1904–1912.

22. Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2019). Fairness and machine learning: Limitations and opportunities. fairmlbook.org.

23. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679.

24. Sundell, J., Levin, H., Nazaroff, W. W., Cain, W. S., Fisk, W. J., Grimsrud, D. T., Gyntelberg, F., Li, Y., Persily, A. K., Pickering, A. C., Samet, J. M., Spengler, J. D., Taylor, S. T., & Weschler, C. J. (2011). Ventilation rates and health: Multidisciplinary review of the scientific literature. Indoor Air, 21(3), 191–204.

25. Allen, J. G., MacNaughton, P., Satish, U., Santanam, S., Vallarino, J., & Spengler, J. D. (2016). Associations of cognitive function scores with carbon dioxide, ventilation, and volatile organic compound exposures in office workers: A controlled exposure study of green and conventional office environments. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(6), 805–812.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-26

How to Cite

Danqing Duan. (2026). AI-Driven Indoor Air Quality Prediction and Health Risk Assessment of Volatile Organic Compounds. Bioinformatics Insights and Analytics, 1(2). Retrieved from https://www.bioinfia.org/index.php/home/article/view/189